Skip to main content

Who's Taking the Panglao Airport Seriously?


Sometimes, people think make-believe stories are true because they are repetitively told.

Okay, GMA was in Bohol sometime middle of this year because she laid (to rest?) the time capsule to signify the start of the airport construction at Panglao. Okay, she and her confreres said that the airport will be funded from the national budget because her government had loan savings equivalent to 2.2 billion, 1 billion of which will be used for the Panglao airport. Okay, Governor Aumentado boasted that the economic internal rate of return of the proposed Panglao airport is 23.6%, by far exceeding NEDA’s required 15%. But were they really serious?

Since the time capsule ceremony, for whatever that was worth, nothing else moved in Panglao (thank heavens!), besides the desperate buying and selling of land, brought about by speculation and fear. Some sources said a bulldozer just paved a few meters of earth just so to make the impression that something was going on for GMA’s visit. Interestingly, I monitored the national dailies that day and watched a few of the newscasts in two of the popular stations in the country and not a single line mentioned an airport, just the highly publicized cabinet meeting. So was she really serious?

GMA also proudly said that the airport will be constructed without foreign loan and the interest savings will make do her promised counterpart. That, she said, 4 months ago. I do not know if she will say the same thing now, especially that the Department of Finance reported a widening budget deficit in July this year, equivalent to 15.4 billion pesos, and a cumulative deficit of 34 billion pesos, or after the worsening economic crisis of the United States, her donor government. Was she really serious or she just plainly underestimated her Boholano audience that fateful 20th day of May?

Governor Aumentado, echoing the words of his ally also boasted that the study conducted by the TCGI Engineers reported a 23.6% economic internal rate of return. UP economist Dr. Ernesto Pernia questioned this claim and demanded for a copy of the study. Dr. Pernia’s major contention was, if this was indeed true, then there would have been any problem for the project to get low-interest loans that would have freed government resources for other more ‘poverty-reducting’ projects. Also, he questioned why a group of engineers were the ones who assessed the financial viability of the project.

But if Governor Aumentado was referring to the documents prepared by Luis Mallonga, Andrelita Sto. Domingo, Cholly Ferolino, Roswel Marasigan, AA Bruce, Cynthia Nario, Ricardo Pinoy, Eugenia Luztre, Ma. Lina Diona, and Bayani Lusica, of the TCGI Engineers with office located at Jaka II Building, 150 Legaspi Street, Legazpi Village, Makati City, I wonder where the figures came from. The team does not have an economist nor an accountant, and contains only all the questionable assumptions of an environmental impact statement on the Panglao airport. Was he really serious?

If it was not the same document, and another one was really prepared, where is it? Dr. Pernia and his group demanded for these documents and a dialogue with the governor. But were the documents made available and has the dialogue really happened?

Now tell me, who is taking the Panglao Airport project really seriously?

Comments

iamliza said…
Good question. But, what Panglao Airport? *wink*


(By the way, sir, my website's now in republicofbohol.com and it's now taking on a magazine-y shape, the commentaries now on the side. I'm still fixing it up, but it's now functional.)
Anonymous said…
What the?!!! it's all publicity most likely.

From a cost benefit analysis and economic perspective, having an international airport in Panglao is not viable both in Bohol. Why spend million of pesos where you have one close, in Cebu. By having an Int'l airport in Panglao, government is killing the fastcraft industry and denting the airport revenue in Cebu. It will be doing more harm than good.
Anonymous said…
Panglao is an airport in the sand for the following reasons:
1. No viable market. Tagbilaran is not even in the top 10 airports in the country in terms of passenger traffic.
2. Support infrastructures in Panglao (or Bohol) are not in place.
3. ROI is eventually nil. No stupid investor would spend billions of PHP (or USD in equivalent amount) and get nothing in return. Charity has its limitations.
4. Develop Caticlan or Kalibo and make it a gateway for Boracay where ROI is sure to come.
Anonymous said…
i think panglao island is not a good idea. who would want to relax in panglao with noisy aircrafts in the background! Just redevelop the old one, perhaps build a new terminal, and thats it!
Research Papers said…
Many institutions limit access to their online information. Making this information available will be an asset to all.
Jeroen said…
I've been having this article on my site for years: Proposed Panglao International Airport makes no Sense.
Miko Cañares said…
Hi Jeroen. Walked myself through your piece and very impressed as to how you positioned your arguments. Amazingly though, after almost two years now, tides have changed. Some of those I mentioned to have said something against the airport in the above piece already gave an approval to the airport. and now they are saying, it is a domestic airport, with international standards, whatever that means.

the congestion at the Tagbilaran airport makes the case for a new domestic airport more pressing. i just arrived from the US yesterday and of the four legs of my flight, it was only in the manila-tagb trip that we got a landing problem. reason? traffic congestion. three planes at tagbi airport with 45 minutes landing-take off difference. we were 30 minutes suspended in air.

so an airport in panglao? maybe? but not the way it was originally planned.

Popular posts from this blog

The Lack of a Backup Plan and Why Ribbon Cuttings Won’t Do the Trick

  I spoke with a friend of mine a few days back, and he told me he is now ready to implement his backup plan – which is to migrate to another country to study a new field and leave all his tourism-related businesses behind.   He told me he did not see it coming. Like with all the others in his sector, he thought that COVID19 is a temporary anomaly and won’t stay for long.     But now, all his businesses are closed, and his cash reserve is bleeding. Despite the many times that the Provincial Government of Bohol announces re-opening with ribbon-cutting events here and there, tourists did not come by truckloads.   They came like summer rain – very few and far in between.     The province’s economic recovery plan is ill-advised and short-sighted.   We all know we relied primarily on tourism to fuel the local economy despite the fact that the sector is the most affected by the pandemic and will continue to be so in at least 3 to five years based on conservative

What is the Church's Business in the Dauis Renaissance Program?

Introduction This paper presents an analysis, in financial perspective, of the details of the agreement entered into by parties 1) The Bishop of Tagbilaran, 2) Beatriz Susanna Zobel de Ayala, 3) Dauis Renaissance Company, Inc. and signed on June 24, 2008 in Dauis, Bohol, Philippines. As the agreement is vague in some respects, figure computations were interpreted on the basis of its implications to financial statements of the “Dauis Renaissance Company”, both currently and prospectively. The paper is structured in three parts. The first section analyses the facts of the agreement and its implication on assets, equities, and net income projections. The relevant provisions of the agreement are cited side by side with the analysis. The second section represents the general independent appraisal of the author on the “Dauis Renaissance Company”, taking collectively all the facts mentioned in the first section. The annex section presents a list of important financial terms which are defin

The Problem with Representative Democracy

The Bohol Chronicle reported today (27 December 2009) that the Sangguniang Panlalawigan has given a go-signal for the governor of the province of Bohol to sign a joint venture and development agreement (JVDA) with Oasis Leisure Islands Development Inc. (OLIDI) to reclaim at least 450 hectares by building 5 islets at Panglao Bay. The provincial lawmakers believed that the proposal was advantageous to the government, as it will not spend any single peso for the project, from its inception to implementation. Interestingly, the Bohol Chronicle reported that Vice Governor Herrera stressed that "Several discussions have been made and the SP met with the proponents many times. Concerns of each board member have been satisfactorily answered." I was appalled. It seems that the Sangguniang Panlalawigan members have not read the proposal in its entirety. I wonder if they could answer questions if reporters will ask them for the details of the proposal. I wonder