Skip to main content


There is one big reason why I cannot stand living in Singapore – space. Limited, constricted, and limiting space, that is.

I realized this when I stayed at a condotel in Makati where all the features of a house are squeezed to fit a 36 square meter floor area. I cannot imagine raising my son in this very limited space – no trees to climb, no grasses to keep his feet moist and dirty. I cannot probably sleep for the fear that my son might accidentally fall from the 21st floor where I live.

Sometimes we fail to acknowledge the fact that in Bohol, we have so much space still (though Tagbilaran may have become crowded in recent past). A physical space to move around is important to one’s psycho, social, emotional and spiritual health.

Physical space gives you a certain degree of freedom – to walk around, to run around, shout and give vent to all sorts of emotions. The movie Revolutionary Road showed Kate Winslet running to the forest to vent her anger and frustration. In the same movie, Leonardo de Caprio, after Winslet’s death, run the whole stretch of Revolutionary Road.

I find it interesting that suicide rates in countries in Southeast Asia are coincidentally (or accidentally) positively correlated with population density. Population density, computed as a proportion of persons per land area, can be a proxy indicator for the amount of space a person has to be able to move around. Hongkong and Singapore, for example, have national suicide rates which are higher than the region’s average. (Though admittedly, there are other conditions contributing to high suicide rates such as cost of living, upward mobility mechanisms and general freedom, among others).

A friend I met in Cairo comes from Kenya where atrocities occurred in the recent national elections. He told me that violence is not in itself election-related, but it is an expression of anger because apart from the fact that economic poverty persists in several regions, people do not have a voice on how their lives have been wasted. Elections, as sites of political participation, “their space” to manoeuvre politically, is undermined by corruption and vote rigging.

Fortunately, in Bohol, while oppressive structures exist, there is an amount of space where the local constituency has the sufficient capacity to move around. While this varies from one place to another, there are concrete efforts of a few local government units to give their constituencies a “voice”, a “political space”.

Jagna, for example, portrays an example where the space where people can participate in governance has been widely increased. I was involved in one capability building session of its new community radio, the first ever in Bohol. The session with the radio team was heart-warming. The participants–from the far-flung barangays of the town, from the women sector, from the porters’ association–all felt delighted and inspired for their chance of getting involved in Jagna’s monumental move towards responsible community information dissemination. As a development worker, it was such an emotional moment to see how the grant of “space” by the powerful can make a tremendous difference in people’s lives.

In a rigidly structured society as Bohol, where economic, political, and religious powers often intersect and influence each other, opening up a space for participation is a hard task from below. For someone to do it from above takes a lot of courage. To open up one’s space is to delimit one’s own. This is the reason why some mayoralty posts in certain towns in the province were, and still are, held by the same families for the last 20 years.

Participatory approaches and legally-mandated avenues for participation needs a brand of leadership that allows space for people to be heard and tolerates criticisms and objections. I wonder how many leaders in the province can do this, and genuinely do so. It is saddening to know that sometimes, while leaders profess that their intent is to listen to people’s voices, they attend to their interest more especially when the situation calls for critical decision and action.


Ask the doctor said…
This is really a well laid out website. I like how you have presented the information in full detail. Keep up the great work and please stop by my site sometime. The url is

Popular posts from this blog

The Problem with Representative Democracy

The Bohol Chronicle reported today (27 December 2009) that the Sangguniang Panlalawigan has given a go-signal for the governor of the province of Bohol to sign a joint venture and development agreement (JVDA) with Oasis Leisure Islands Development Inc. (OLIDI) to reclaim at least 450 hectares by building 5 islets at Panglao Bay. The provincial lawmakers believed that the proposal was advantageous to the government, as it will not spend any single peso for the project, from its inception to implementation. Interestingly, the Bohol Chronicle reported that Vice Governor Herrera stressed that "Several discussions have been made and the SP met with the proponents many times. Concerns of each board member have been satisfactorily answered." I was appalled. It seems that the Sangguniang Panlalawigan members have not read the proposal in its entirety. I wonder if they could answer questions if reporters will ask them for the details of the proposal. I wonder

How much does it take to rebuild Candijay after Odette?

Damage of Typhoon Odette to Basic Infrastructure in Candijay, Bohol (Source:  Jean Celeste Paredes, based on Candijay MDRRMO's RDANA)   To rebuild the infrastructure of the town of   Candijay in Bohol, the Philippines, back to its situation before Typhoon Odette, it needs a whopping 922 million Philippine pesos .   Ninety percent (90%) of that requirement is for the reconstruction of 6,924 houses, 16% of which are totally damaged.   Candijay is home to 33,699 people living in totally or partially damaged houses.       The typhoon did not spare basic infrastructures.   Total damages estimated in schools amounted to Php20 million and in basic health facilities as clinics up to Php3.3 million.   Damages in churches and chapels were estimated at Php9 million, while in other public infrastructures, as barangay halls and covered courts, it was estimated at Php34 million.   Also,   total damages to roads nd bridges were estimated at Php22 million pesos.   Density of A

What is the Church's Business in the Dauis Renaissance Program?

Introduction This paper presents an analysis, in financial perspective, of the details of the agreement entered into by parties 1) The Bishop of Tagbilaran, 2) Beatriz Susanna Zobel de Ayala, 3) Dauis Renaissance Company, Inc. and signed on June 24, 2008 in Dauis, Bohol, Philippines. As the agreement is vague in some respects, figure computations were interpreted on the basis of its implications to financial statements of the “Dauis Renaissance Company”, both currently and prospectively. The paper is structured in three parts. The first section analyses the facts of the agreement and its implication on assets, equities, and net income projections. The relevant provisions of the agreement are cited side by side with the analysis. The second section represents the general independent appraisal of the author on the “Dauis Renaissance Company”, taking collectively all the facts mentioned in the first section. The annex section presents a list of important financial terms which are defin